ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
DysPIA: A Novel Dysregulated Pathway Identification Analysis Method.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-specific analysis of co-expression to measure biological network rewiring in individuals.Life science alliance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential co-expression-based pathway analysis is still limited and not widely used. In most current methods, the pathways were considered as gene sets, but the gene regulation relationships were not considered, and the computational speed was slow. In this article, we proposed a novel Dysregulated Pathway Identification Analysis (DysPIA) method to overcome these shortcomings. We adopted the idea of Correlation by Individual Level Product into analysis and performed a fast enrichment analysis. We constructed a combined gene-pair background which was much more sufficient than the background used in Edge Set Enrichment Analysis. In simulation study, DysPIA was able to identify the causal pathways with high AUC (0.9584 to 0.9896). In p53 mutation data, DysPIA obtained better performance than other methods. It obtained more potential dysregulated pathways that could be literature verified, and it ran much faster (∼1,700-8,000 times faster than other methods when 10,000 permutations). DysPIA was also applied to breast cancer relapse dataset and breast cancer subtype dataset. The results show that DysPIA is effective and has a great biological significance. R packages "DysPIA" and "DysPIAData" are constructed and freely available on R CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DysPIA/index.html and https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DysPIAData/index.html), and on GitHub (https://github.com/lemonwang2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.