Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34290567›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use2020

Potential for cannabis adaptation among participants in a drunk driving intervention.

Michael Scherer, Paul Marques, Amy R Manning, Thomas H Nochajski, Eduardo Romano, Eileen Taylor, Robert Voas, Sagan King

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SchererPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Paul MarquesPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Amy R ManningPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Thomas H NochajskiUniversity at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Eduardo RomanoPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Eileen TaylorPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Robert VoasPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Sagan KingClinical Psychology Department, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Washington, DC, USA.
Institute for Research and Evaluation · USPacific Institute For Research and Evaluation · USThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Managing Heavy Drinking to Avoid Impaired Driving: A Study of Interlock UsersR01AA022312 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI NOCHAJSKI, THOMAS H, ROMANO, EDUARDO O · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome alcohol interventions have been found to have the adverse outcome of increasing non-alcohol-related substance use. It is unknown, however, how changes in alcohol use over the course of alcohol ignition interlocks - a common DUI intervention - may impact other substance use.

methodsAlcohol and cannabis use were measured using hair ethylglucuronide and Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in blood, respectively. Participants (N = 69) were measured at the interlock installation period and again 6-months later while the interlock was installed. A mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine changes in levels of ethanol and THC over time.

resultsOn measures of marijuana use, there was a significant interaction effect between the group that increased alcohol use and time

conclusionsInstalling interlocks may inadvertently increase cannabis use among those who decrease alcohol use. Crash risk associated with cannabis use is notably less than that of alcohol use, however, continued cannabis use may be problematic when the device is removed and alcohol use is expected to return to the higher pre-interlock levels.

Indexed as

alcohol ignition interlockalcohol misuseDUIMarijuana use

Identifiers

PMID34290567
PMCPMC8291721
OpenAlexW3016147263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.