ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2021
Machine learning approach for discrimination of genotypes based on bright-field cellular images.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning identifies heterogeneous subpopulations in breast cancer cell lines.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- Evaluating the utility of brightfield image data for mechanism of action prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based approaches for identifying human blood cells harboring CRISPR-mediated fetal chromatin domain ablations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphological profiling is a combination of established optical microscopes and cutting-edge machine vision technologies, which stacks up successful applications in high-throughput phenotyping. One major question is how much information can be extracted from an image to identify genetic differences between cells. While fluorescent microscopy images of specific organelles have been broadly used for single-cell profiling, the potential ability of bright-field (BF) microscopy images of label-free cells remains to be tested. Here, we examine whether single-gene perturbation can be discriminated based on BF images of label-free cells using a machine learning approach. We acquired hundreds of BF images of single-gene mutant cells, quantified single-cell profiles consisting of texture features of cellular regions, and constructed a machine learning model to discriminate mutant cells from wild-type cells. Interestingly, the mutants were successfully discriminated from the wild type (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.773). The features that contributed to the discrimination were identified, and they included those related to the morphology of structures that appeared within cellular regions. Furthermore, functionally close gene pairs showed similar feature profiles of the mutant cells. Our study reveals that single-gene mutant cells can be discriminated from wild-type cells based on BF images, suggesting the potential as a useful tool for mutant cell profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.