Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289873›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Recruiting 'hard to reach' parents for health promotion research: experiences from a qualitative study.

Louise Tully, Eleni Spyreli, Virginia Allen-Walker, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Sheena McHugh, Jayne Woodside, Michelle C McKinley, Patricia M Kearney, Moira Dean, Catherine Hayes and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise TullyHealth Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. LMTully1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-0408
Eleni SpyreliCentre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Virginia Allen-WalkerCentre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Karen Matvienko-SikarSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Sheena McHughSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Jayne WoodsideCentre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Michelle C McKinleyCentre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Moira DeanSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Catherine HayesSchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Caroline HearySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Colette KellyHealth Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Queen's University Belfast · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity College Cork · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Safefood, the Food Safety Promotion Board 11-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMarginalised populations are less likely to take part in health research, and are sometimes considered 'easy to ignore'. We aimed to describe our approach and results of recruiting parents who experience disadvantage, for focus groups exploring infant feeding on the island of Ireland. Upon receiving ethical approval, we implemented recruitment strategies that included building rapport with community organisations through existing networks, targeting specific organisations with information about our aims, and utilising social media groups for parents.

resultsWe approached 74 organisations of which 17 helped with recruitment. We recruited 86 parents/carers (one male) for 19 focus groups (15 urban/4 rural). Seventy two percent met at the eligibility criteria. Most participants were recruited through organisations (91%), and the remainder on social media (9%). Recruitment barriers included multiple steps, research fatigue, or uncertainty around expectations. Factors such as building rapport, simplifying the recruitment process and being flexible with procedures were facilitators. Despite comprehensive, multi-pronged approaches, the most marginalised parents may not have been reached. Further alternative recruitment strategies are required for recruiting fathers, rural populations, or those without the capacity or opportunity to engage with local services.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSocial MediaFocus GroupsHumansInfantIrelandMaleQualitative ResearchHealth promotion researchHidden populationsMarginalized groupsParentingQualitative researchResearch recruitmentSeldom heard voicesSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID34289873
PMCPMC8293495
OpenAlexW3185636630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.