Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289859›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

A review of the clinical outcomes in idursulfase-treated and untreated Filipino patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II: data from the local lysosomal storage disease registry.

Marie Julianne C Racoma, Maria Kristina Karizza B Calibag, Cynthia P Cordero, Mary Ann R Abacan, Mary Anne D Chiong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Targeting Neurological Aspects of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Beyond.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Misdiagnosis in mucopolysaccharidoses.Journal of applied genetics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie Julianne C RacomaDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines. mcracoma@up.edu.ph.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-3191
Maria Kristina Karizza B CalibagDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Cynthia P CorderoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Mary Ann R AbacanDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Mary Anne D ChiongInstitute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Philippine General Hospital · PHUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) is an X-linked multisystem disorder characterized by glycosaminoglycan (GAG) accumulation, caused by a deficiency of iduronate-2-sulfatase (I2S). Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant idursulfase (IDS), the standard of care, was started in the Philippines in 2017. This study reviewed the clinical outcomes in idursulfase-treated and untreated Filipino MPS II patients who were included in the local Lysosomal Storage Disease (LSD) registry of the Institute of Human Genetics-National Institutes of Health (IHG-NIH) from January 1999 to December 2019.

methodsA retrospective audit of records of MPS II patients listed in the registry was done. Qualified patients were divided into two cohorts: idursulfase-treated group (patients on enzyme replacement therapy, ERT, for ≥ 6 months) and untreated group. Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, biochemical results, neurocognitive classification, respiratory involvement, mortality, and adverse events, were recorded. Height, weight, cardiac pathology, liver and spleen sizes, six-minute walking test (6MWT), joint mobility, were determined at baseline and at year 1 and 2 of follow up.

resultsForty male patients were included in this review, with only 8 receiving ERT since 2017. The mean age at diagnosis was 6.99 years (SD 4.15; 0.75-20) and mean age at start of ERT was 14.03 years (SD 7.1; 4-21.5), more delayed than previous reports. Eighty percent have early progressive phenotype which was higher than reported average. The early growth pattern differed in our Filipino cohort, but was followed by the expected slowed growth in later years. Improvements in the following endpoints were observed in the treated cohort: height and weight, cardiac disease, liver and spleen sizes, and joint mobility. There were also positive effects on respiratory involvement and mortality rate. Adverse events were consistent with previous reports.

conclusionsERT is generally well tolerated and effective in reducing GAG storage and improving clinical endpoints among our Filipino MPS II patients. In untreated patients, typical disease progression was observed.

Indexed as

Iduronate SulfataseMucopolysaccharidosis IIEnzyme Replacement TherapyHumansMalePhilippinesRegistriesRetrospective StudiesIduronate SulfataseidursulfaseEnzyme replacement therapyFilipinoHunter syndromeIdursulfaseMucopolysaccharidosis type IIRare diseaseRegistry

Identifiers

PMID34289859
PMCPMC8293534
OpenAlexW3126064128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.