Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289820›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2021

Growth and tolerance of healthy, term infants fed lower protein extensively hydrolyzed or amino acid-based formula: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Craig B Adams, William H Johnston, Harold Deulofeut, Joseph Leader, Robbie Rhodes, Michael Yeiser, Cheryl L Harris, Jennifer L Wampler, Rebecca J Hill, Timothy Cooper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01354366 (The Effects on Growth and Tolerance of Hypoallergenic Formulas Fed to Term Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01354366 completednot on this map

The Effects on Growth and Tolerance of Hypoallergenic Formulas Fed to Term Infants

TypeobservationalSponsorMead Johnson NutritionRan2011 to 2012Enrolled511ConditionsGrowth of Term InfantsArmsInfant formula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Craig B AdamsSoutheastern Pediatric Associates, 364 Honeysuckle Road, Dothan, AL, 36305, USA.
William H JohnstonBirmingham Pediatric Associates, 806 St Vincent's Drive, Suite 615, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA.
Harold DeulofeutChildren's Medical Association, 8430 W Broward Blvd, Plantation, FL, 33324, USA.
Joseph LeaderWoburn Pediatric Associates Research Dept, 7 Alfred Street, Suite 220, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA.
Robbie RhodesCentral Arkansas Pediatric Clinic, 2301 Springhill Road, Suite 200, Benton, AR, 72019, USA.
Michael YeiserOwensboro Pediatrics, 2200 East Parrish Ave, Owensboro, KY, 42303, USA.
Cheryl L HarrisMedical Affairs and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, 47721, USA.
Jennifer L WamplerMedical Affairs and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, 47721, USA. jennifer.wampler@rb.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-711X
Rebecca J HillMedical Affairs and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, 47721, USA.
Timothy CooperMedical Affairs and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, 47721, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal protein level in hypoallergenic infant formulas is an area of ongoing investigation. The aim was to evaluate growth of healthy term infants who received extensively hydrolyzed (EH) or amino acid (AA)-based formulas with reduced protein.

methodsIn this prospective, multi-center, double-blind, controlled, parallel group study, infants were randomized to receive a marketed EH casein infant formula at 2.8 g protein/100 kcal (Control) or one of two investigational formulas: EH casein formula at 2.4 g protein/100 kcal (EHF) or AA-based formula at 2.4 g total protein equivalents/100 kcal (AAF). Control and EHF each had 2 × 10

resultsNo group differences in weight or length growth rate from 14 to 120 days were detected. With the exception of significant differences at several study time points for males, no group differences were detected in mean head circumference growth rates. However, mean achieved weight, length, and head circumference demonstrated normal growth throughout the study period. No group differences in achieved weight or length (males and females) and head circumference (females) were detected and means were within the WHO growth 25th and 75th percentiles from 14 to 120 days of age. With the exception of Day 90, there were no statistically significant group differences in achieved head circumference for males; means remained between the WHO 50th and 75th percentiles for growth at Days 14, 30, and 60 and continued along the 75th percentile through Day 120. No differences in study discontinuation due to formula were detected. The number of participants for whom at least one adverse event was reported was similar among groups.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated hypoallergenic infant formulas at 2.4 g protein/100 kcal were safe, well-tolerated, and associated with appropriate growth in healthy term infants from 14 to 120 days of age.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01354366 . Registered 13 May 2011.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsInfant FormulaCaseinsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleProspective StudiesAmino AcidsCaseinsAmino acidExtensively hydrolyzed proteinInfant formulaLactobacillus rhamnosus GG

Identifiers

PMID34289820
PMCPMC8293492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.