Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289495›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021

The Relationship Between Visual Sensitivity and Eccentricity, Cone Density and Outer Segment Length in the Human Foveola.

Niklas Domdei, Jenny L Reiniger, Frank G Holz, Wolf M Harmening

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Asymmetries in Foveal Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Optimal Retinal Locus for High-Resolution Vision in Space and Time.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Fixational eye movements as active sensation for high visual acuity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Asymmetries in foveal vision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Oculomotor Contributions to Foveal Crowding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Intervisit Reproducibility of Foveal Cone Density Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  18. In Vivo Assessment of Retinal Phenotypes in Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niklas DomdeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jenny L ReinigerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Wolf M HarmeningDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The cellular topography of the human foveola, the central 1° diameter of the fovea, is strikingly non-uniform, with a steep increase of cone photoreceptor density and outer segment (OS) length toward its center. Here, we assessed to what extent the specific cellular organization of the foveola of an individual is reflected in visual sensitivity and if sensitivity peaks at the preferred retinal locus of fixation (PRL). Methods: Increment sensitivity to small-spot, cone-targeted visual stimuli (1 × 1 arcmin, 543-nm light) was recorded psychophysically in four human participants at 17 locations concentric within a 0.2° diameter on and around the PRL with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy-based microstimulation. Sensitivity test spots were aligned with cell-resolved maps of cone density and cone OS length. Results: Peak sensitivity was at neither the PRL nor the topographical center of the cone mosaic. Within the central 0.1° diameter, a plateau-like sensitivity profile was observed. Cone density and maximal OS length differed significantly across participants, correlating with their peak sensitivity. Based on these results, biophysical simulation allowed to develop a model of visual sensitivity in the foveola, with distance from the PRL (eccentricity), cone density, and OS length as parameters. Conclusions: Small-spot sensitivity thresholds in healthy retinas will help to establish the range of normal foveolar function in cell-targeted vision testing. Because of the high reproducibility in replicate testing, threshold variability not explained by our model is assumed to be caused by individual cone and bipolar cell weighting at the specific target locations.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdultCell CountFemaleFovea CentralisHumansMaleOphthalmoscopyRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRod Cell Outer SegmentTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID34289495
PMCPMC8300048
OpenAlexW3186954431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.