Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289317›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

FIELD

Concetta Piazzese, Elin Evans, Betsan Thomas, John Staffurth, Sarah Gwynne, Emiliano Spezi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Concetta PiazzeseUniversity of Huddersfield, School of Computing & Engineering, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-1809
Elin EvansClinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Betsan ThomasClinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
John StaffurthClinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah GwynneClinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
Emiliano SpeziCardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTarget volume delineation (TVD) has been identified as a weakness in the accuracy of radiotherapy, both within and outside of clinical trials due to the intra/interobserver variations affecting the TVD quality. Sources of variations such as poor compliance or protocol violation may have adverse effect on treatment outcomes. In this paper, we present and describe the FIELD

methodsFor each site-specific clinical case included in the FIELD

resultsResults show the trainees' improvement when reoutlining a case after reviewing the feedback generated from the FIELD

conclusionWe presented a new open-source software to support education in TVD and ongoing continuous professional development for clinical oncology trainees and consultants. ARENA in combination with FIELD ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: FIELD

Indexed as

SoftwareClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansOrgans at RiskQuality ImprovementRadiation OncologyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34289317
PMCPMC9328049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.