Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289295›Full record

ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2021

Perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to receive vaccination among health workers in Nigeria.

Oluseyi Ademola Adejumo, Olorunfemi Akinbode Ogundele, Cynthia Roli Madubuko, Rosena Olubanke Oluwafemi, Ogochukwu Chinedum Okoye, Kenechukwu Chukwuemeka Okonkwo, Sunday Samson Owolade, Oladimeji Adedeji Junaid, Olutoyin Morenike Lawal, Adenike Christianah Enikuomehin and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Oluseyi Ademola AdejumoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Olorunfemi Akinbode OgundeleDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Cynthia Roli MadubukoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Rosena Olubanke OluwafemiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Ogochukwu Chinedum OkoyeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
Kenechukwu Chukwuemeka OkonkwoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Sunday Samson OwoladeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Oladimeji Adedeji JunaidDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Olutoyin Morenike LawalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Adenike Christianah EnikuomehinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Maureen Iru NtajiDepartment of Community Medicine, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
Aisha SokunbiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Aina Omodele TimothyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Olatunji Sunday AbolarinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Olalekan AliDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Nigeria.
John Oghenevwirhe Ohaju-ObodoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
University of Medical Sciences, OndoDelta State University · NGUniversity of Benin Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to examine health workers' perceptions of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine in Nigeria and their willingness to receive the vaccine when it becomes available.

methodsThis multi-center cross-sectional study used non-probability convenience sampling to enroll 1,470 hospital workers aged 18 and above from 4 specialized hospitals. A structured and validated self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data entry and analysis were conducted using IBM SPSS ver. 22.0.

resultsThe mean age of respondents was 40±6 years. Only 53.5% of the health workers had positive perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine, and only slightly more than half (55.5%) were willing to receive vaccination. Predictors of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine included having a positive perception of the vaccine (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.50-5.69), perceiving a risk of contracting COVID-19 (AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.25-3.98), having received tertiary education (AOR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.40-6.86), and being a clinical health worker (AOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.68).

conclusionPerceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to receive the vaccine were sub-optimal among this group. Educational interventions to improve health workers' perceptions and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine are needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 vaccineHealth workersNigeriaPerceptionWillingness

Identifiers

PMID34289295
PMCPMC8408417
OpenAlexW3179524334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.