Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289221›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2021

Exploring the diversity of promoter and 5'UTR sequences in ancestral, historic and modern wheat.

Michael C U Hammond-Kosack, Robert King, Kostya Kanyuka, Kim E Hammond-Kosack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael C U Hammond-Kosack *Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Robert KingDepartment of Computational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Kostya KanyukaDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-4123
Kim E Hammond-Kosack *Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9699-485X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J/00426X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A data set of promoter and 5'UTR sequences of homoeo-alleles of 459 wheat genes that contribute to agriculturally important traits in 95 ancestral and commercial wheat cultivars is presented here. The high-stringency myBaits technology used made individual capture of homoeo-allele promoters possible, which is reported here for the first time. Promoters of most genes are remarkably conserved across the 83 hexaploid cultivars used with <7 haplotypes per promoter and 21% being identical to the reference Chinese Spring. InDels and many high-confidence SNPs are located within predicted plant transcription factor binding sites, potentially changing gene expression. Most haplotypes found in the Watkins landraces and a few haplotypes found in Triticum monococcum, germplasms hitherto not thought to have been used in modern wheat breeding, are already found in many commercial hexaploid wheats. The full data set which is useful for genomic and gene function studies and wheat breeding is available at https://rrescloud.rothamsted.ac.uk/index.php/s/DMCFDu5iAGTl50u/authenticate.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticum5' Untranslated RegionsAllelesHaplotypes5' Untranslated Regionsagronomic traitshaplotypespromoter capturerepetitive elements (RE)sequence variationtranscription factor binding sites (TFBS)transposable elements (TE)Triticum aestivumTriticum monococcumWatkins landraces

Identifiers

PMID34289221
PMCPMC8633512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.