Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289039›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Microstimulation of the Premotor Cortex of the Cat Produces Phase-Dependent Changes in Locomotor Activity.

Nicolas Fortier-Lebel, Toshi Nakajima, Nabiha Yahiaoui, Trevor Drew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cortical sculpting of a rhythmic motor program.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Exploring the Consistent Roles of Motor Areas Across Voluntary Movement and Locomotion.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas Fortier-LebelDépartement de Neurosciences, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur le Cerveau et l'Apprentissage (CIRCA) Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Toshi NakajimaDepartment of Integrative Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Nabiha YahiaouiDépartement de Neurosciences, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur le Cerveau et l'Apprentissage (CIRCA) Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Trevor DrewDépartement de Neurosciences, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur le Cerveau et l'Apprentissage (CIRCA) Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the functional organization of premotor areas in the cat pericruciate cortex we applied intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) within multiple cytoarchitectonically identified subregions of areas 4 and 6 in the awake cat, both at rest and during treadmill walking. ICMS in most premotor areas evoked clear twitch responses in the limbs and/or head at rest. During locomotion, these same areas produced phase-dependent modifications of muscle activity. ICMS in the primary motor cortex (area 4γ) produced large phase-dependent responses, mostly restricted to the contralateral forelimb or hindlimb. Stimulation in premotor areas also produced phase-dependent responses that, in some cases, were as large as those evoked from area 4γ. However, responses from premotor areas had more widespread effects on multiple limbs, including the ipsilateral limbs, than did stimulation in 4γ. During locomotion, responses in both forelimb and hindlimb muscles were evoked from cytoarchitectonic areas 4γ, 4δ, 6aα, and 6aγ. However, the prevalence of effects in a given limb varied from one area to another. The results suggest that premotor areas may contribute to the production, modification, and coordination of activity in the limbs during locomotion and may be particularly pertinent during modifications of gait.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsBrain MappingElectric StimulationForelimbHindlimbLocomotioncatintracortical microstimulationlocomotionpremotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID34289039
PMCPMC8568009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.