Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34289038›Full record

Trial reportBlood2022

Prognostic value of minimal residual disease negativity in myeloma: combined analysis of POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA.

Michele Cavo, Jesus San-Miguel, Saad Z Usmani, Katja Weisel, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Bruno Paiva, Nizar J Bahlis, Torben Plesner, Vania Hungria and 17 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02076009 phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2024Enrolled569ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsDaratumumab, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone
NCT02136134 phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd) vs Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2024Enrolled498ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsDaratumumab, VELCADE (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone
NCT02195479 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) Compared to Daratumumab in Combination With VMP (D-VMP), in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High-dose Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2024Enrolled706ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsVelcade, Melphalan, Prednisone, Daratumumab IV, Dexamethasone
NCT02252172 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High Dose Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2015 to 2024Enrolled737ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsDaratumumab IV, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Daratumumab SC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Michele CavoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jesus San-MiguelClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBER-ONC, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-4857
Saad Z UsmaniLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Katja WeiselDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Meletios A DimopoulosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Hervé Avet-LoiseauUnite de Genomique du Myelome, IUC-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Bruno PaivaClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBER-ONC, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-3815
Nizar J BahlisArnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Torben PlesnerVejle Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Vania HungriaClinica Medica São Germano, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-1957
Philippe MoreauHematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Maria-Victoria MateosUniversity Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL/Cancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-1218
Aurore PerrotHematology Department, University Cancer Institute IUCT, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0131-8689
Shinsuke IidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-ku Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-960X
Thierry FaconUniversity of Lille, CHU Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France.
Shaji KumarDepartment of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-5392-9284
Niels W C J van de DonkDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter SonneveldErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew SpencerMalignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Maria KrevvataJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA.
Christoph HeuckJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA.
Jianping WangJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Jon UkropecJanssen Global Medical Affairs, Horsham, PA.
Rachel KobosJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA.
Steven SunJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Mia QiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Nikhil MunshiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and.

Funding

Targeting Genomic Instability and Evolution in MyelomaP01CA155258 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Jill Corre · 2011 to 2026
$32.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA155258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored minimal residual disease (MRD) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) using data from 4 phase 3 studies (POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA). Each study previously demonstrated that daratumumab-based therapies improved MRD negativity rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by approximately half vs standards of care. We conducted a large-scale pooled analysis for associations between patients achieving complete response or better (≥CR) with MRD-negative status and progression-free survival (PFS). MRD was assessed via next-generation sequencing (10-5 sensitivity threshold). Patient-level data were pooled from all 4 studies and for patients with TIE NDMM and patients with RRMM who received ≤2 prior lines of therapy (≤2 PL). PFS was evaluated by response and MRD status. Median follow-up (months) was 54.8 for POLLUX, 50.2 for CASTOR, 40.1 for ALCYONE, and 36.4 for MAIA. Patients who achieved ≥CR and MRD negativity had improved PFS vs those who failed to reach CR or were MRD positive (TIE NDMM and RRMM hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, P < .0001; TIE NDMM and RRMM ≤2 PL HR 0.20, P < .0001). This benefit occurred irrespective of therapy or disease setting. A time-varying Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that ≥CR with MRD negativity was associated with improved PFS. Daratumumab-based treatment was associated with more patients reaching ≥CR and MRD negativity. These findings represent the first large-scale analysis with robust methodology to support ≥CR with MRD negativity as a prognostic factor for PFS in RRMM and TIE NDMM. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02076009, #NCT02136134, #NCT02195479, and #NCT02252172.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonaldaratumumab

Identifiers

PMID34289038
PMCPMC8832474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.