ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2021
Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of two azaleas, Rhododendron ripense and Rhododendron kiyosumense.
Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A highly contiguous genome assembly of Cyclamen persicum to accelerate functional genomics and breeding.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- Pangenome analysis reveals the genetic mechanism underlying high-altitude adaptation in Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau Rhododendron.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- A pangenome insight into the genome divergence and flower color diversity among Rhododendron species.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Evaluating the utility of deep genome skimming for phylogenomic analyses: A case study in the species-rich genusPlant diversity · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- The complete chloroplast genome ofComparative cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Gapless genome assembly of azalea and multi-omics investigation into divergence between two species with distinct flower color.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Creating novel ornamentalsFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Characterization, comparative phylogenetic, and gene transfer analyses of organelle genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance the genomics and genetics of azalea, the whole-genome sequences of two species of Rhododendron were determined and analysed in this study: Rhododendron ripense, the cytoplasmic donor and ancestral species of large-flowered and evergreen azalea cultivars; and Rhododendron kiyosumense, a native of Chiba prefecture (Japan) seldomly bred and cultivated. A chromosome-level genome sequence assembly of R. ripense was constructed by single-molecule real-time sequencing and genetic mapping, while the genome sequence of R. kiyosumense was assembled using the single-tube long fragment read sequencing technology. The R. ripense genome assembly contained 319 contigs (506.7 Mb; N50 length: 2.5 Mb) and was assigned to the genetic map to establish 13 pseudomolecule sequences. On the other hand, the genome of R. kiyosumense was assembled into 32,308 contigs (601.9 Mb; N50 length: 245.7 kb). A total of 34,606 genes were predicted in the R. ripense genome, while 35,785 flower and 48,041 leaf transcript isoforms were identified in R. kiyosumense through Iso-Seq analysis. Overall, the genome sequence information generated in this study enhances our understanding of genome evolution in the Ericales and reveals the phylogenetic relationship of closely related species. This information will also facilitate the development of phenotypically attractive azalea cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.