ArticlePloS one2021
Automatic cell counting from stimulated Raman imaging using deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Integration in Optical Microscopy: Advancements and Applications.Microscopy research and technique · 2026Review
- Influence of preprocessing of stimulated Raman scattering images on the performance of deep neural networks for detecting cancer tissue.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning empowered coherent Raman imaging and analysis for biomedical applications.Communications engineering · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Stimulated Raman Histology: New Frontiers in Vibrational Tissue Imaging.Cancers · 2024Review
- Label-free optical imaging for brain cancer assessment.Trends in cancer · 2024Review
- YOLOv5-FPN: A Robust Framework for Multi-Sized Cell Counting in Fluorescence Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Leukocyte differentiation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids using higher harmonic generation microscopy and deep learning.PloS one · 2023Article
- From Research to Diagnostic Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Neurosciences: Past and Perspectives.Free neuropathology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an automatic cell counting framework for stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) images, which can assist tumor tissue characteristic analysis, cancer diagnosis, and surgery planning processes. SRS microscopy has promoted tumor diagnosis and surgery by mapping lipids and proteins from fresh specimens and conducting a fast disclose of fundamental diagnostic hallmarks of tumors with a high resolution. However, cell counting from label-free SRS images has been challenging due to the limited contrast of cells and tissue, along with the heterogeneity of tissue morphology and biochemical compositions. To this end, a deep learning-based cell counting scheme is proposed by modifying and applying U-Net, an effective medical image semantic segmentation model that uses a small number of training samples. The distance transform and watershed segmentation algorithms are also implemented to yield the cell instance segmentation and cell counting results. By performing cell counting on SRS images of real human brain tumor specimens, promising cell counting results are obtained with > 98% of area under the curve (AUC) and R = 0.97 in terms of cell counting correlation between SRS and histological images with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The proposed cell counting scheme illustrates the possibility and potential of performing cell counting automatically in near real time and encourages the study of applying deep learning techniques in biomedical and pathological image analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.