Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288967›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Evaluation of a child food reward task and its association with maternal feeding practices.

Jia Ying Toh, Phaik Ling Quah, Chun Hong Wong, Wen Lun Yuan, Izzuddin M Aris, Keri McCrickerd, Keith M Godfrey, Yap-Seng Chong, Lynette P Shek, Kok Hian Tan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jia Ying TohSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-7465
Phaik Ling QuahSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Chun Hong WongDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4610-0053
Wen Lun YuanDepartment of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Izzuddin M ArisDivision of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-7476
Keri McCrickerdClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Keith M GodfreyMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit and National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital, Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4643-0618
Yap-Seng ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Lynette P ShekSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9064-8983
Kok Hian TanMaternal Fetal Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Fabian YapDuke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael J MeaneyIntegrative Neurosciences, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science and Technology, Brenner Centre for Molecular Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Ciarán G FordeClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Yung Seng LeeSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Birit F P BroekmanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Mary F F ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational University of Singapore · SGHarvard University · USNational Health Service · GBSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences · SG

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food reward is defined as the momentary value of a food to the individual at the time of ingestion and is characterised by two psychological processes-"liking" and "wanting". We aimed to validate an age-appropriate food reward task to quantify implicit wanting of children from the GUSTO cohort (n = 430). At age 5 years, child appetitive traits and maternal feeding practices were reported by mothers via questionnaires. At age 6, a write-for-food task based on the child's preference for food or toy rewards was undertaken in laboratory conditions. Child BMI and skinfold measurements were taken at age 7. Convergent validity of the food reward task was assessed by associating with child appetitive traits, where enjoyment of food/food responsiveness (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.15) and emotional overeating (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.48) were positively associated with high food reward in children. Criterion validity was tested by associating with child BMI, however no significant relationships were observed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with maternal feeding practices revealed that children whose mother tend to restrict unhealthy food (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.82) and girls whose mothers taught them about nutrition (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.19, 3.67) were more likely to have high food reward. No further significant associations were observed between food reward, other appetitive traits and feeding practices. Despite the lack of association with child weight status, this study demonstrated the value of the write-for-food task to assess food reward in children and presented sex-specific associations with maternal feeding practices.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorFeeding BehaviorMothersRewardSex CharacteristicsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansHyperphagiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34288967
PMCPMC8294516
OpenAlexW3185083145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.