Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288868›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Two NLR immune receptors acquired high-affinity binding to a fungal effector through convergent evolution of their integrated domain.

Aleksandra Białas, Thorsten Langner, Adeline Harant, Mauricio P Contreras, Clare Em Stevenson, David M Lawson, Jan Sklenar, Ronny Kellner, Matthew J Moscou, Ryohei Terauchi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fine mapping and functional verification of the Cf-19 gene controlling leaf mold disease resistance in tomato.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aleksandra BiałasThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-2189
Thorsten LangnerThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3401-8888
Adeline HarantThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Mauricio P ContrerasThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-0730
Clare Em StevensonDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
David M LawsonDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7637-4303
Jan SklenarThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Ronny KellnerThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4618-0110
Matthew J MoscouThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2098-6818
Ryohei TerauchiDivision of Genomics and Breeding, Iwate Biotechnology Research Centre, Iwate, Japan.
Mark J BanfieldDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8921-3835
Sophien KamounThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-0315

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M02198XBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P012574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subset of plant NLR immune receptors carry unconventional integrated domains in addition to their canonical domain architecture. One example is rice Pik-1 that comprises an integrated heavy metal-associated (HMA) domain. Here, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of Pik-1 and its NLR partner, Pik-2, and tested hypotheses about adaptive evolution of the HMA domain. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the HMA domain integrated into Pik-1 before Oryzinae speciation over 15 million years ago and has been under diversifying selection. Ancestral sequence reconstruction coupled with functional studies showed that two Pik-1 allelic variants independently evolved from a weakly binding ancestral state to high-affinity binding of the blast fungus effector AVR-PikD. We conclude that for most of its evolutionary history the Pik-1 HMA domain did not sense AVR-PikD, and that different Pik-1 receptors have recently evolved through distinct biochemical paths to produce similar phenotypic outcomes. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of the evolutionary mechanisms underpinning NLR adaptation to plant pathogens.

Indexed as

AllelesFungiGenes, PlantGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsMetals, HeavyModels, MolecularOryzaPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsProtein DomainsReceptors, ImmunologicSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinMetals, HeavyPlant ProteinsReceptors, ImmunologicevolutionNLRplant biologyplant defensePoaceaerice

Identifiers

PMID34288868
PMCPMC8294853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.