Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288550›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2021

The application of pangenomics and machine learning in genomic selection in plants.

Philipp E Bayer, Jakob Petereit, Monica Furaste Danilevicz, Robyn Anderson, Jacqueline Batley, David Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-3067
Jakob PetereitSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-0380
Monica Furaste DanileviczSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-8184
Robyn AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-3932
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection approaches have increased the speed of plant breeding, leading to growing crop yields over the last decade. However, climate change is impacting current and future yields, resulting in the need to further accelerate breeding efforts to cope with these changing conditions. Here we present approaches to accelerate plant breeding and incorporate nonadditive effects in genomic selection by applying state-of-the-art machine learning approaches. These approaches are made more powerful by the inclusion of pangenomes, which represent the entire genome content of a species. Understanding the strengths and limitations of machine learning methods, compared with more traditional genomic selection efforts, is paramount to the successful application of these methods in crop breeding. We describe examples of genomic selection and pangenome-based approaches in crop breeding, discuss machine learning-specific challenges, and highlight the potential for the application of machine learning in genomic selection. We believe that careful implementation of machine learning approaches will support crop improvement to help counter the adverse outcomes of climate change on crop production.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsMachine LearningPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID34288550
PMCPMC12807306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.