Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288545›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2021

Characterization of the blood and neutrophil-specific microbiomes and exploration of potential bacterial biomarkers for sepsis in surgical patients.

Chenyang Wang, Qiurong Li, Chun Tang, Xiaofan Zhao, Qin He, Xingming Tang, Jianan Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi‑omics reveal neutrophil heterogeneity in sepsis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chenyang WangResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5074-7960
Qiurong LiResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-3161
Chun TangResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaofan ZhaoResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Qin HeResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xingming TangResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jianan RenResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4697-4762
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent studies have demonstrated the presence of a circulating microbiome in the blood of healthy subjects and chronic inflammatory patients. However, our knowledge regarding the blood microbiome and its potential roles in surgical patients remains very limited. The objective of this study was to determine the blood microbial landscape in surgical patients and to explore its potential associations with postoperative sepsis. MATERIALS AND

methods2825 patients who underwent surgical treatments were screened for enrollment and 204 cases were recruited in this study. The patients were sub-grouped into noninfected, infected, sepsis, and septic shock according to postoperative clinical manifestations. A total of 222 blood samples were obtained for neutrophil isolation, DNA extraction and high-throughput sequencing, quantitative proteomics analysis, and flow cytometric analyses.

resultsBlood and neutrophils in surgical patients and healthy controls contained highly diverse microbiomes, mainly comprising Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The majority (80.7%-91.5%) of the microbiomes were composed of gut-associated bacteria. The microbiomes in septic patients were significantly distinct from those of healthy controls, and marked differences in microbiome composition were observed between sepsis and septic shock groups. Several specific bacterial genera, including Flavobacterium, Agrococcus, Polynucleobacter, and Acidovorax, could distinguish patients with septic shock from those with sepsis, with higher area under curve values. Moreover, Agrococcus, Polynucleobacter, and Acidovorax were positively associated with the sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment scores and/or acute physiology and chronic health examination scores in septic shock patients. The proteins involved in bactericidal activities of neutrophils were downregulated in septic patients.

conclusionsWe present evidence identifying significant changes of blood and neutrophil-specific microbiomes across various stages of sepsis, which might be associated with the progression of sepsis after surgical treatments. Several certain bacterial genera in blood microbiome could have potential as microbial markers for early detection of sepsis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSepsisBacteriaBiomarkersHumansNeutrophilsBiomarkersblood microbiomehigh-throughput sequencingneutrophil-specific microbiomesepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34288545
PMCPMC8589375
OpenAlexW3186476404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.