Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288376›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

The use of collimator angle optimization and jaw tracking for VMAT-based single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for up to six targets in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system.

Lauren M M Pudsey, Dean Cutajar, Alex Wallace, Anastasia Saba, Laurel Schmidt, Andrej Bece, Catherine Clark, Yoshiya Yamada, Giordano Biasi, Anatoly Rosenfeld and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren M M PudseyCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-7341
Dean CutajarCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Alex WallaceSt George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Anastasia SabaSt George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Laurel SchmidtCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Andrej BeceSt George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Catherine ClarkCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Yoshiya YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Giordano BiasiCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-6881
Anatoly RosenfeldCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Joel PoderCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
University of Wollongong · AUSt George Hospital · AUMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIsland blocking occurs in single-isocenter multiple-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) whenever targets share multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf pairs. This study investigated the effect on plan quality and delivery, of reducing island blocking through collimator angle optimization (CAO). In addition, the effect of jaw tracking in this context was also investigated.

methodsFor CAO, an algorithm was created that selects the collimator angle resulting in the lowest level of island blocking, for each beam in any given plan. Then, four volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SIMT SRS plans each were generated for 10 retrospective patients: two CAO plans, with and without jaw tracking, and two plans with manually selected collimator angles, with and without jaw tracking. Plans were then assessed and compared using typical quality assurance procedures.

resultsThere were no substantial differences between plans with and without CAO. Jaw tracking produced statistically significant reduction in low-dose level parameters; healthy brain V10% and mean dose were reduced by 9.66% and 15.58%, respectively. However, quantitative values (108 cc for V10% and 0.35 Gy for mean dose) were relatively small in relation to clinical relevance. Though there were no statistically significant changes in plan deliverability, there was a notable trend of plans with jaw tracking having lower gamma analysis pass rates.

conclusionThese findings suggest that CAO has limited benefit in VMAT SIMT SRS of 2-6 targets when using a low-dose penalty to the healthy brain during plan optimization in Eclipse. As clinical benefits of jaw tracking were found to be minimal and plan deliverability was potentially reduced, a cautious approach would be to exclude jaw tracking in SIMT SRS plans.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studiescollimator angle optimizationisland blockingjaw trackingmultiple brain metastasessingle-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34288376
PMCPMC8425912
OpenAlexW3185324902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.