Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288262›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2021

Toward a Treatment Sequencing Strategy: A Systematic Review of Treatment Regimens in Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

Daniel V Catenacci, Joseph Chao, Kei Muro, Salah Eddin Al-Batran, Samuel J Klempner, Zev A Wainberg, Manish A Shah, Sun Young Rha, Atsushi Ohtsu, Astra M Liepa and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel V Catenacci *University of Chicago Medical Center & Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7517-8020
Joseph Chao *City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Kei MuroAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Salah Eddin Al-BatranInstitute of Clinical Cancer Research Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany.
Samuel J KlempnerMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zev A WainbergUCLA Santa Monica Medical Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Manish A ShahWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sun Young RhaYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Atsushi OhtsuNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Astra M LiepaEli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Holly KnodererEli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Anindya ChatterjeeEli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eric Van CutsemDigestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlatinum and fluoropyrimidine combinations typically comprise first-line (1L) therapy in advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA), although controversy exists regarding the use of 5doublet versus triplet cytotoxic regimens. Historically, second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) therapy has been fragmented. Recent trials have increased the need for optimal treatment sequencing in advanced G/GEA. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed manuscripts of randomized clinical trials examining 1L, 2L, and 3L+ therapy for advanced G/GEA published from 2009 through November 19, 2019. When available, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, overall response rate, and toxicity were extracted from each and compared descriptively.

resultsIn 1L therapy, chemotherapy triplets demonstrated variable efficacy improvements with invariable increased toxicity compared with platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublets. Currently, the only published report of positive outcomes using biologics in 1L describes adding trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing advanced G/GEA. In 2L, doublet chemotherapy regimens are not uniformly more efficacious than single-agent taxanes or irinotecan, and ramucirumab has demonstrated improved outcomes both as monotherapy and in combination.

conclusionFor advanced G/GEA, review of trial results from 2009-2019 support 1L therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine and sequencing with taxanes or irinotecan in combination with biologics as effective 2L options. Escalating to a triplet may add some efficacy at the expense of added toxicity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The rapidly changing treatment landscape for advanced gastric cancer includes increasing options for refractory disease. With multiple first-line platinum-based regimens, identification of those with the best benefit-to-risk ratio may provide guidance on treatment sequencing strategies. This article presents findings from the published literature of randomized controlled trials that included a first-line platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination and, for second-line trials, patients with platinum/fluoropyrimidine-refractory disease. This guiding summary could be a tool for clinicians to identify the optimal first-line regimen(s) followed by a strategy for subsequent regimens.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophagogastric JunctionHumansGastroesophageal adenocarcinomaRandomized controlled trialsSystemic therapyTreatment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34288262
PMCPMC8488781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.