Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288182›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2021

Diagnostic accuracy of Ara h 2 for detecting peanut allergy in children.

Hannah M Kansen, Francine C van Erp, Yolanda Meijer, Dianne M W Gorissen, Marike Stadermann, Maartje F van Velzen, Willem R Keusters, Geert W J Frederix, André C Knulst, Cornelis K van der and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic accuracy of Ara h 2 for detecting peanut allergy in children.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah M KansenDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-7704
Francine C van ErpDepartment of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-5608
Yolanda MeijerDepartment of Pediatric Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dianne M W GorissenDepartment of Pediatrics, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Marike StadermannDepartment of Allergology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maartje F van VelzenDepartment of Pediatrics, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Willem R KeustersJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geert W J FrederixJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
André C KnulstDepartment of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis K van derDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thuy-My LeDepartment of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecific IgE to Ara h 2 is a diagnostic test for peanut allergy which may reduce the need for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC); however, guidance for using Ara h 2 in place of DBPCFCs has not been validated.

objectiveTo prospectively evaluate 1) diagnostic accuracy of previously published Ara h 2 cut-off levels to diagnose peanut allergy in children and 2) costs.

methodsA consecutive series of 150 children age 3.5 to 18 years was evaluated in secondary and tertiary settings in the Netherlands. sIgE to Ara h 2 was the index test, and oral peanut ingestion was the reference test. Oral peanut ingestion was home or supervised introduction for Ara h 2 ≤ 0.1, DBPCFC for 0.1-5.0 and open food challenge for ≥5.0. Costs were calculated using financial healthcare data.

resultsA conclusive reference test was performed in 113 children (75%). Sixty-four children (57%) had peanut allergy, as confirmed by a DBPCFC (27/47) or an open challenge (37/50). Forty-nine children (43%) were considered peanut-tolerant after peanut introduction (19/19), a DBPCFC (20/47) or an open challenge (10/50). Area under the curve for Ara h 2 was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.98). The diagnostic flow chart correctly classified 26/26 (100%; 84-100) of children with Ara h 2 ≤ 0.1 as peanut-tolerant and 34/35 (97%; 83-100) of children with Ara h 2 ≥ 5.0 as peanut-allergic. At a cut-off of ≤0.1 and ≥5.0, a sensitivity of respectively 100% (93-100) and 53% (38-67) was observed and a specificity of 53% (38-67) and 98% (87-100). Mean annual costs of the flow chart were estimated as €320-€636 per patient lower than following national allergy guidelines.

conclusionsIn this diagnostic accuracy study, which did not take into account pretest probability, we have validated previously published Ara h 2 cut-off levels which are associated with peanut tolerance and allergy.

Indexed as

2S Albumins, PlantAdolescentAntigens, PlantChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EMalePeanut HypersensitivityProspective StudiesReference Values2S Albumins, PlantAntigens, PlantAra h 2 allergen, Arachis hypogaeaImmunoglobulin Eanxietycomponent-resolved diagnosticscostsfood challengepeanut allergy

Identifiers

PMID34288182
PMCPMC8456915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.