Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288112›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Development of a spiral spin- and gradient-echo (spiral-SAGE) approach for improved multi-parametric dynamic contrast neuroimaging.

Ashley M Stokes, Sudarshan Ragunathan, Ryan K Robison, Alberto Fuentes, Laura C Bell, John P Karis, James G Pipe, C Chad Quarles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Aberrant vascular architecture in the hippocampus correlates with tau burden in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashley M StokesBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1137-5003
Sudarshan RagunathanBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-1758
Ryan K RobisonBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-0653
Alberto FuentesBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Laura C BellBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
John P KarisBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
James G PipeBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-1162
C Chad QuarlesBarrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Funding

MRI Assessment of Tumor Perfusion, Permeability and CellularityR01CA158079 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARLES, CHRISTOPHER CHAD · 2011 to 2021
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a spiral-based combined spin- and gradient-echo (spiral-SAGE) method for simultaneous dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-MRI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI).

methodsUsing this sequence, we obtained gradient-echo TEs of 1.69 and 26 ms, a SE TE of 87.72 ms, with a TR of 1663 ms. Using an iterative SENSE reconstruction followed by deblurring, spiral-induced image artifacts were minimized. Healthy volunteer images are shown to demonstrate image quality using the optimized reconstruction, as well as for comparison with EPI-based SAGE. A bioreactor phantom was used to compare dynamic-contrast time courses with both spiral-SAGE and EPI-SAGE. A proof-of-concept cohort of patients with brain tumors shows the range of hemodynamic maps available using spiral-SAGE.

resultsComparison of spiral-SAGE images with conventional EPI-SAGE images illustrates substantial reductions of image distortion and artifactual image intensity variations. Bioreactor phantom data show similar dynamic contrast time courses between standard EPI-SAGE and spiral-SAGE for the second and third echoes, whereas first-echo data show improvements in quantifying T

conclusionSpiral-SAGE provides a substantial improvement for the assessment of perfusion and permeability by mitigating artifacts typically encountered with EPI and by providing a shorter echo time for improved characterization of permeability. Spiral-SAGE enables quantification of perfusion, permeability, and vessel architectural parameters, as demonstrated in brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsContrast MediaBrainEcho-Planar ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingContrast Mediabrain tumorsdynamic susceptibility contrastperfusion imagingspin and gradient echospiral

Identifiers

PMID34288112
PMCPMC10228679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.