Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34288094›Full record

Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2021

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LiRIS 400 mg in women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome with or without Hunner lesions.

Robert Evans, Alfred Kohan, Robert Moldwin, Daniel Radecki, Till Geib, Kenneth M Peters

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02395042 phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study, Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of LiRIS® 400 mg in Females With Interstitial Cystitis With Hunner's Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2015 to 2017Enrolled59ConditionsCystitis, Interstitial, UlcerArmsLiRIS®, LiRIS Placebo
NCT02411110 phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of LiRIS® 400 mg in Females With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2015 to 2017Enrolled131ConditionsCystitis, Interstitial, Painful Bladder SyndromeArmsLiRIS®, LiRIS Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Does large volume of distribution of lidocaine masks its systemic uptake from bladder?American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert EvansUrology, Wake Forest Baptist Hospital, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-7152
Alfred KohanBethpage Division, Advanced Urology Centers of New York, Bethpage, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-6662
Robert MoldwinUrologic Infectious/Inflammatory Diseases, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, Lake Success, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-9160
Daniel RadeckiSpecialty Development, AbbVie, Irvine, California, USA.
Till GeibSpecialty Development, AbbVie, Irvine, California, USA.
Kenneth M PetersUrology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-598X
AbbVie (United States) · USArthur Smith Institute for Urology · USAsperger/Autism Network · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USOakland University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTwo phase 2 studies were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-releasing intravesical system (LiRIS) in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) with (Study 001; NCT02395042) or without, (Study 002; NCT02411110) Hunner lesions (HL).

methodsBoth were multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and enrolled women aged ≥18 years. In Study 001, patients were randomized 2:1:1 to LiRIS 400 mg/LiRIS 400 mg, placebo/LiRIS 400 mg, or placebo/placebo for a continuous 28 (2 × 14)-day period. In Study 002, patients were randomized 1:1 to LiRIS 400 mg or placebo for a continuous (single treatment) 14-day period.

resultsIn total, 59 and 131 patients received treatment in Studies 001 and 002, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, the change from baseline to Week 4 of follow-up post-removal in mean daily average bladder numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in either study (Study 001: placebo/placebo, -1.6; LiRIS/LiRIS, -2.7, p = 0.142; placebo/LiRIS, -2.5, p = 0.319; Study 002: LiRIS -1.2; placebo, -1.5, p = 0.505). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in daily worst NRS pain score, number of micturitions/day or urgency episodes/day. There was no clear trend for reduction in number of HL for LiRIS vs placebo. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups in both studies; most were mild or moderate intensity.

conclusionThese studies did not demonstrate a treatment effect of LiRIS 400 mg compared with placebo, either in patients with IC/BPS with HL, or in those without HL.

Indexed as

Cystitis, InterstitialAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLidocainePelvic PainTreatment OutcomeLidocaineintravesicallidocainepainful bladder syndromephase 2

Identifiers

PMID34288094
OpenAlexW3186012090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.