Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287933›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2022

Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.

Victoria S McKenna, Courtney L Kendall, Tulsi H Patel, Rebecca J Howell, Renee L Gustin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence of Vocal Fatigue Due to the Use of Facial Protective Gear in Teaching Medical Professionals.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects of experience on recognition of speech produced with a face mask.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria S McKennaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-905X
Courtney L KendallDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
Tulsi H PatelDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
Rebecca J HowellDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-0325
Renee L GustinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisWe investigated speech acoustics and self-reported vocal symptoms in mask-wearing healthcare professionals. We hypothesized that there would be an attenuation of spectral energies and increase in vocal effort during masked speech compared to unmasked speech. STUDY

designWithin and between subject quasi-experimental design.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 21 healthcare providers (13 cisgender female, 8 cisgender male; M = 32.9 years; SD = 7.9 years) and assessed acoustics and perceptual measures with and without a face mask in place. Measurements included: 1) acoustic Vowel Articulation Index (VAI); 2) cepstral and spectral acoustic measures; 3) traditional vocal measures (e.g., fundamental frequency, intensity); 4) relative fundamental frequency (RFF); and 5) self-reported ratings of vocal effort and dyspnea.

resultsDuring masked speech, there was a significant reduction in VAI, high-frequency information (>4 kHz), and RFF offset 10, as well as a significant increase in cepstral peak prominence and perceived vocal effort. Further analysis showed that high-frequency attenuation was more pronounced when wearing an N95 mask compared to a simple mask.

conclusionsFace masks pose an additional barrier to effective communication that primarily impacts spectral characteristics, vowel space measures, and vocal effort. Future work should evaluate how long-term mask use impacts vocal health and may contribute to vocal problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:391-397, 2022.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMasksSpeech AcousticsVoiceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultacousticsSpeech-language pathologyvoice disorders

Identifiers

PMID34287933
PMCPMC8742743
OpenAlexW3184614877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.