Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287829›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2021

A higher-level nuclear phylogenomic study of the carrot family (Apiaceae).

James J Clarkson, Alexandre R Zuntini, Olivier Maurin, Stephen R Downie, Gregory M Plunkett, Antoine N Nicolas, James F Smith, Mary Ann E Feist, Karime Gutierrez, Panagiota Malakasi and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Root stomata inAoB PLANTS · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylogeny and Taxonomic Revision of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

James J ClarksonRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1780-5599
Alexandre R ZuntiniRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0705-8902
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-6164
Stephen R DownieDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4772-0625
Gregory M PlunkettCullman Program for Molecular Systematics, New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA.
Antoine N NicolasDepartment of Biology, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY, 10471, USA.
James F SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1515, USA.
Mary Ann E FeistDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Karime GutierrezDepartment of Biology, Smith College, Burton Hall 115, Northampton, MA, 01063, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-8108
Panagiota MalakasiRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Paul BaileyRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Grace E BrewerRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Niroshini EpitawalageRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Sue ZmarztyRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-433X
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-1831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseThe carrot family (Apiaceae) comprises 466 genera, which include many well-known crops (e.g., aniseed, caraway, carrots, celery, coriander, cumin, dill, fennel, parsley, and parsnips). Higher-level phylogenetic relationships among subfamilies, tribes, and other major clades of Apiaceae are not fully resolved. This study aims to address this important knowledge gap.

methodsTarget sequence capture with the universal Angiosperms353 probe set was used to examine phylogenetic relationships in 234 genera of Apiaceae, representing all four currently recognized subfamilies (Apioideae, Azorelloideae, Mackinlayoideae, and Saniculoideae). Recovered nuclear genes were analyzed using both multispecies coalescent and concatenation approaches.

resultsWe recovered hundreds of nuclear genes even from old and poor-quality herbarium specimens. Of particular note, we placed with strong support three incertae sedis genera (Platysace, Klotzchia, and Hermas); all three occupy isolated positions, with Platysace resolved as sister to all remaining Apiaceae. We placed nine genera (Apodicarpum, Bonannia, Grafia, Haplosciadium, Microsciadium, Physotrichia, Ptychotis, Tricholaser, Xatardia) that have never previously been included in any molecular phylogenetic study.

conclusionsWe provide support for the maintenance of the four existing subfamilies of Apiaceae, while recognizing that Hermas, Klotzschia, and the Platysace clade may each need to be accommodated in additional subfamilies (pending improved sampling). The placement of the currently apioid genus Phlyctidocarpa can be accommodated by the expansion of subfamily Saniculoideae, although adequate morphological synapomorphies for this grouping are yet to be defined. This is the first phylogenetic study of the Apiaceae using high-throughput sequencing methods and represents an unprecedented evolutionary framework for the group.

Indexed as

ApiaceaeDaucus carotaBiological EvolutionCell NucleusPhylogenyAngiosperms353Apialesmolecular phylogeneticstarget sequence capturetree of lifeUmbelliferae

Identifiers

PMID34287829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.