Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287787›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Contralateral Axillary Nodal Metastases: Stage IV Disease or a Manifestation of Progressive Locally Advanced Breast Cancer?

Amanda L Nash, Samantha M Thomas, Jennifer K Plichta, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, E Shelley Hwang, Rachel A Greenup, Laura H Rosenberger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L NashDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer K PlichtaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Oluwadamilola M FayanjuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6747
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Rachel A GreenupDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Laura.Rosenberger@duke.edu.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Using Modifiable Risk Factors to Predict Inferior Care and Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Addressing Health DisparitiesK08CA241390 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAYANJU, OLUWADAMILOLA M. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health P30CA014236 (PI: Kastan)NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241390NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContralateral axillary nodal metastases (CAM) is classified as stage IV disease, although many centers treat CAM with curative intent. We hypothesized that patients with CAM, treated with multimodality therapy, would have improved overall survival (OS) versus patients with distant metastatic disease (M1) and similar OS to those with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

methodsUsing the NCDB (2004-2016), we categorized adult patients with node-positive breast cancer into three study groups: LABC, CAM, and M1. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize the unadjusted OS. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of study group with OS.

resultsA total of 94,487 patients were identified: 122 with CAM, 12,325 with LABC, and 82,040 with M1 (median follow-up 63.6 months). LABC and CAM patients had similar histology and rates of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy receipt. However, the CAM group had significantly larger tumors, more estrogen-receptor expression, higher T-stage, and more mastectomies than the LABC group. Compared with M1 patients, CAM patients were more likely to have grade 3 and cT4 tumors. Patients with CAM and LABC had similar 5-year unadjusted OS and significantly improved OS vs M1 patients. After adjustment, LABC and CAM patients continued to have similar OS and better OS vs M1 patients.

conclusionsCAM patients who receive multi-modal therapy with curative intent may have OS more comparable to LABC patients than M1 patients. Out data support a reevaluation of whether CAM should remain classified as M1, as N3 may better reflect disease prognosis and treatment goals.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34287787
PMCPMC8429191
OpenAlexW3185338693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.