Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287728›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2021

Problem-solving with MRI in acute abdominopelvic conditions, part 2: gynecological, obstetric, vascular, and renal diseases.

Pankaj Nepal, Wendaline VanBuren, Kanika Khandelwal, Achille Mileto, Theodora Potrezke, Ashish Khandelwal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pankaj NepalDepartment of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Wendaline VanBurenDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kanika KhandelwalDepartment of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Austin, MN, USA.
Achille MiletoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Theodora PotrezkeDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ashish KhandelwalDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Khandelwal.Ashish@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2728-7799
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USSt. Vincent's Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of abdominopelvic emergencies. Owing to intrinsically high soft-tissue contrast resolution, and ability to resolve different soft tissue, MRI holds notable advantages over other imaging modalities and can be used as a problem-solving tool. Additional advantages of MRI include lack of radiation-related risks to children and pregnant women, and the ability to acquire detailed diagnostic information even without intravenous contrast which can be beneficial in patients with contrast allergy and end-stage renal disease. In the part 2, the authors focus on MRI features of female pelvic gynecological diseases, pregnancy- related complications, abdominal vascular complications, and renal diseases.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancy ComplicationsAbdomenAcute DiseaseFemaleHumansPelvisPregnancyAbdomenEmergencyEmergency departmentMRIPelvis

Identifiers

PMID34287728
OpenAlexW3183525251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.