ArticleBrain structure & function2021
Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Inside the head of Crotalus durissus LINNAEUS, 1758 (Serpentes, Viperidae, Crotalinae): Macroscopic description of the brain with ontogenetic insights.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- The SmARTR pipeline: A modular workflow for the cinematic rendering of 3D scientific imaging data.iScience · 2024Article
- Dynamic evolutionary interplay between ontogenetic skull patterning and whole-head integration.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Reconstructing the origin and early evolution of the snake brain.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental properties, and the behavioral habits of species impact sensory cues available for foraging, predator avoidance and inter/intraspecific communication. Consequently, relationships have been discovered between the sensory ecology and brain morphology in many groups of vertebrates. However, these types of studies have remained scare on snake. Here, we investigate the link between endocranial shape and the sensory-related ecology of snakes by comparing 36 species of snakes for which we gathered six sensory-ecology characteristics. We use µCT scanning and 3D geometric morphometrics to compare their endocranium in a phylogenetically informed context. Our results demonstrate that size is a major driver of endocranial shape, with smaller species tending to maximize endocranial volume using a more bulbous shape, while larger species share an elongate endocranial morphology. Phylogeny plays a secondary role with more derived snakes diverging the most in endocranial shape, compared to other species. The activity period influences the shape of the olfactory and optic tract, while the foraging habitat impacts the shape of the cerebellum and cranial nerve regions: structures involved in orientation, equilibrium, and sensory information. However, we found that endocranial morphology alone is not sufficient to predict the activity period of a species without prior knowledge of its phylogenetic relationship. Our results thus demonstrate the value of utilizing endocranial shape as complementary information to size and volume in neurobiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34287703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.