Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287700›Full record

ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Subsidence of a metaphyseal-anchored press-fit stem after 4-year follow-up: an EBRA-FCA analysis.

Dietmar Dammerer, Philipp Blum, David Putzer, Dietmar Krappinger, Michael C Liebensteiner, Michael Nogler, Martin Thaler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-operative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dietmar DammererDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp BlumDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. philippblum1@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-2411
David PutzerDepartment of Experimental Orthopaedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Sonnenburgstr. 16, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dietmar KrappingerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael C LiebensteinerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael NoglerDepartment of Experimental Orthopaedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Sonnenburgstr. 16, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin ThalerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUncemented stem migration analysis by EBRA-FCA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen Analyse, Femoral Component Analyse) has been seen to be a good predictive indicator for early implant failure. In this study, we investigated the migration behavior of a cementless metaphyseal-anchored press-fit stem after 4-year follow-up.

methodsApplying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who between 2012 and 2017 received a cementless Accolade II press-fit stem at our Department. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. EBRA-FCA measurements and statistical investigations were performed by two independent investigators.

resultsA total of 102 stems in 91 patients (female 60; male 31) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 66.2 (range 24.3-92.6) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a mean subsidence of 1.4 mm (range 0.0-12.0) at final follow-up. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.5° (range 0.0°-2.8°) after 48 months. No correlations between gender or Dorr types and subsidence were found (p > 0.05). A body mass index > 30 kg/m

conclusionsMigration pattern of the metaphyseal-anchored stem and a low subsidence rate at final follow-up may predict a good long-term clinical result.

trial registrationNumber: 20181024-1875.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCementlessEinzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA)Stem subsidenceTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34287700
PMCPMC9296414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.