Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287545›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2021

Implementation of the e-SUS Primary Care system: Impact on the routine of Primary Health Care professionals.

Tatiele Estefâni Schönholzer, Ione Carvalho Pinto, Fabiana Costa Machado Zacharias, Rodrigo André Cuevas Gaete, Maria Del Pilar Serrano-Gallardo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance indicators of Primary Care of the Previne Brasil Program.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatiele Estefâni SchönholzerUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-8807
Ione Carvalho PintoUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-5591
Fabiana Costa Machado ZachariasUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-6114
Rodrigo André Cuevas GaeteUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8689-5428
Maria Del Pilar Serrano-GallardoUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Faculdad de Medicina, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-6821
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BRUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto understand how the implementation of the e-SUS Primary Care system has been processed and its impact on the daily life of the health teams.

methoda qualitative research study, conducted in a municipality in the inland of the state of São Paulo with professionals who work in Primary Health Care and use the e-SUS Primary Care system as a work tool. Semi-structured interviews and thematic data analysis were used with Kotter's three-phase approach.

resultsa total of 17 professionals, nurses, physicians, dentists and community agents were interviewed. The implementation of e-SUS Primary Care and its impact on the daily life of health teams were understood in terms of mandatory implementation; weaknesses for implementation, such as absence of material resources and implicit imposition for the use of the system; fragile training for deployment and learning from experience.

conclusiona harmful incentive process was observed, conducted from the perspective of institutional pressure, use of the system to justify the work performed and, on the other hand, there was the creation of collaborative learning mechanisms between the teams.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareBrazilHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID34287545
PMCPMC8294795
OpenAlexW3186632811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.