Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287387›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2021

Comparison of Immunochromatographic Test (ICT) and Filariasis Test Strip (FTS) for Detecting Lymphatic Filariasis Antigen in American Samoa, 2016.

Meru Sheel, Colleen L Lau, Sarah Sheridan, Saipale Fuimaono, Patricia M Graves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Potential use of antibodies to provide an earlier indication of lymphatic filariasis resurgence in post-mass drug ad ministration surveillance in American Samoa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meru SheelNational Centre for Epidemiology and Health, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5453-070X
Colleen L LauFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8288-4169
Sarah SheridanNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Saipale FuimaonoAmerican Samoa Department of Health, Pago Pago, AS 96799, USA.
Patricia M GravesCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns 4870, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-3901
Australian National University · AUAmerican Samoa Government · ASJames Cook University · AUNational Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance · AU

Funding

Task Force for Global Health OPP1053230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating filarial antigen (Ag) prevalence, measured using rapid point-of-care tests, is the standard indicator used for monitoring and surveillance in the Global Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis. In 2015, the immunochromatographic test (ICT) was replaced with the filariasis test strip (FTS), which has higher reported sensitivity. Despite differences in sensitivity, no changes in recommended surveillance targets were made when the FTS was introduced. In 2016, we conducted lymphatic filariasis surveys in American Samoa using FTS, which found higher Ag prevalence than previous surveys that used ICT. To determine whether the increase was real, we assessed the concordance between FTS and ICT results by paired testing of heparinised blood from 179 individuals (63% FTS-positive). ICT had 93.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identifying FTS-positive persons, and sensitivity was not associated with age, gender, or presence of microfilariae. Based on these findings, if ICT had been used in the 2016 surveys, the results and interpretation would have been similar to those reported using FTS. American Samoa would have failed Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) of Grade 1 and 2 children with either test, and community prevalence would not have been significantly different (4.1%, 95% CI, 3.3-4.9% with FTS vs. predicted 3.8%, 95%, CI: 3.1-4.6% with ICT).

Indexed as

American Samoaantigendiagnosticslymphatic filariasis

Identifiers

PMID34287387
PMCPMC8293346
OpenAlexW3185029650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.