Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287382›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2021

A Rapid Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Chagas Disease.

Cody J Malone, Immaculate Nevis, Eduardo Fernández, Ana Sanchez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of Chagas TESA VirClia assay for chronicJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Identification of novel bromodomain inhibitors ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cody J MaloneDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-5394
Immaculate NevisDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-201X
Eduardo FernándezDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-947X
Ana SanchezDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-2518
Brock University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease remains a neglected tropical disease, causing significant burden in the Americas and countries that receive immigrants from endemic nations. Current pharmaceutical treatments are suboptimal, not only varying drastically in efficacy, depending on the stage of disease, but also presenting significant risk of adverse events. The objective of this review is to provide a timely update on the efficacy and safety of current trypanocidals. Eligible studies published from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrieved by one reviewer from six electronic databases. Ana-lysis was done with review management software and risk of bias was assessed using tools appropriate for the type of study (i.e., experimental or observational). Thirteen studies (10 observational and three RCTs) were included in the analysis. All 13 studies tested Benznidazole (BNZ) or Nifurtimox (NFX), and two studies also tested Posaconazole (POS) or E1224 (Ravucanazole). BNZ was found to be the most efficacious trypanocidal drug compared to Nifurtimox, POS, and E1224; it also resulted in the highest percentage of adverse effects (AEs) and treatment discontinuation due to its toxicity. Adults experienced higher frequency of neurological AEs while taking BNZ or NFX compared to children. Children had a higher frequency of general AEs compared to adults while taking BNZ. Overall, BNZ is still the most efficacious, but development of new, less toxic drugs is paramount for the quality of life of patients. Studies testing combination therapies and shorter regimens are needed, as is the devising of better clinical parameters and laboratory biomarkers to evaluate treatment efficacy. Considering the variability in methodology and reporting of the studies included in the present analysis, we offer some recommendations for the improvement and replicability of clinical studies investigating pharmacological treatment of Chagas disease. These include full disclosure of methodology, standardization of outcome measures, and always collecting and reporting data on both the efficacy of trypanocidals and on safety outcomes.

Indexed as

American TrypanosomiasisChagas diseaserapid reviewtrypanocidals

Identifiers

PMID34287382
PMCPMC8293415
OpenAlexW3180770757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.