Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287357›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2021

Experimental Protocol to Assess Neuromuscular Plasticity Induced by an Exoskeleton Training Session.

Roberto Di Marco, Maria Rubega, Olive Lennon, Emanuela Formaggio, Ngadhnjim Sutaj, Giacomo Dazzi, Chiara Venturin, Ilenia Bonini, Rupert Ortner, Humberto Antonio Cerrel Bazo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Roberto Di MarcoDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3644-352X
Maria RubegaDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0744-3109
Olive LennonSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, 4 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7005-3616
Emanuela FormaggioDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-0388
Ngadhnjim Sutajg.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria.
Giacomo DazziDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Chiara VenturinDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Ilenia BoniniOspedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione di Motta di Livenza, 31045 Treviso, Italy.
Rupert Ortnerg.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4887-2564
Humberto Antonio Cerrel BazoOspedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione di Motta di Livenza, 31045 Treviso, Italy.
Luca ToninDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9751-7190
Stefano TortoraDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-1221
Stefano MasieroDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-4898
Alessandra Del FeliceDepartment of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, via Belzoni, 160, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7694-1697
On Behalf Of The Pro Gait Consortium
University of Padua · ITAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITGuger Technologies (Austria) · ATUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

EU-funded H2020 Research and Innovation Staff 318 Exchange grant 778043Italian Ministry for foreign Affairs and International Cooperation PGR-01045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exoskeleton gait rehabilitation is an emerging area of research, with potential applications in the elderly and in people with central nervous system lesions, e.g., stroke, traumatic brain/spinal cord injury. However, adaptability of such technologies to the user is still an unmet goal. Despite important technological advances, these robotic systems still lack the fine tuning necessary to adapt to the physiological modification of the user and are not yet capable of a proper human-machine interaction. Interfaces based on physiological signals, e.g., recorded by electroencephalography (EEG) and/or electromyography (EMG), could contribute to solving this technological challenge. This protocol aims to: (1) quantify neuro-muscular plasticity induced by a single training session with a robotic exoskeleton on post-stroke people and on a group of age and sex-matched controls; (2) test the feasibility of predicting lower limb motor trajectory from physiological signals for future use as control signal for the robot. An active exoskeleton that can be set in full mode (i.e., the robot fully replaces and drives the user motion), adaptive mode (i.e., assistance to the user can be tuned according to his/her needs), and free mode (i.e., the robot completely follows the user movements) will be used. Participants will undergo a preparation session, i.e., EMG sensors and EEG cap placement and inertial sensors attachment to measure, respectively, muscular and cortical activity, and motion. They will then be asked to walk in a 15 m corridor: (i) self-paced without the exoskeleton (pre-training session); (ii) wearing the exoskeleton and walking with the three modes of use; (iii) self-paced without the exoskeleton (post-training session). From this dataset, we will: (1) quantitatively estimate short-term neuroplasticity of brain connectivity in chronic stroke survivors after a single session of gait training; (2) compare muscle activation patterns during exoskeleton-gait between stroke survivors and age and sex-matched controls; and (3) perform a feasibility analysis on the use of physiological signals to decode gait intentions.

Indexed as

agingEEGEMGexoskeletonneuromuscular plasticityrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID34287357
PMCPMC8293335
OpenAlexW3183083802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.