Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287317›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2021

Rheological Properties, Surface Microhardness, and Dentin Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Methacrylate-Functionalized Polyacids and Spherical Pre-Reacted Glass Fillers.

Whithipa Thepveera, Wisitsin Potiprapanpong, Arnit Toneluck, Somruethai Channasanon, Chutikarn Khamsuk, Naruporn Monmaturapoj, Siriporn Tanodekaew, Piyaphong Panpisut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Whithipa ThepveeraFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Wisitsin PotiprapanpongFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Arnit ToneluckFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Somruethai ChannasanonNational Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-6858
Chutikarn KhamsukAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center (A-MED), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Naruporn MonmaturapojAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center (A-MED), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Siriporn TanodekaewNational Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-5556
Piyaphong PanpisutFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-857X
National Science and Technology Development Agency · THThammasat University · TH

Funding

Faculty Of Dentistry, Thammasat University 2/2563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to prepare experimental resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) containing low levels of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) for pulp protection. Liquid and powder phases of the experimental RMGICs were polyacid functionalized with methacrylate groups and spherical pre-reacted glass fillers (SPG). Two types of liquid phase containing 0 wt. % HEMA (CM liquid) or 5 wt. % HEMA (CMH liquid) were formulated. The experimental RMGICs were prepared by mixing SPG fillers with CM liquid (F1) or CMH liquid (F2). Rheological properties were examined using a strain-controlled rheometer (n = 5). The Vickers microhardness (n = 5) and dentin shear bond strength (SBS) (n = 10) of the materials were tested. Commercial pulp protection materials (Vitrebond and TheraCal LC) were used as comparisons. The viscosity and surface microhardness of F1 (22 m Pa·s, 18 VHN) and F2 (18 m Pa·s, 16 VHN) were significantly higher than those of Vitrebond (6 mPa·s, 6 VHN) and TheraCal (0.1 mPa·s, 7 VHN). The SBS of F1 (10.7 MPa) and F2 (11.9 MPa) was comparable to that of Vitrebond (15.4 MPa) but higher than that of TheraCal LC (5.6 MPa). The addition of 5 wt. % HEMA showed no significant effect on viscosity, surface microhardness, or SBS of the experimental RMGICs. The experimental materials showed higher viscosity and microhardness but similar SBS when compared with the commercial RMGIC.

Indexed as

2-hydroxyethyl methacrylateresin-modified glass ionomer cementsrheological propertiesshear bond strengthsurface microhardness

Identifiers

PMID34287317
PMCPMC8293056
OpenAlexW3182698461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.