ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2021
Neonatal Screening for SCID: The French Experience.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in the NHS newborn blood spot screening programme: a systematic review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Five-year experience of a combined newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy and severe combined immunodeficiency in Liguria, Italy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Optimizing TREC- and KREC-based newborn screening: Risk-stratified algorithms significantly reduce referrals.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- Syndromic Inborn Errors of Immunity in TREC-Newborn Screening: 5-year Experience from the German Screening Program.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- T-Cell Receptor Excision Circle/Kappa-Deleting Recombination Excision Circle-Based Newborn Screening Program for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in Kumamoto, Japan.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- The clinical and socioeconomic aspects of t-cell receptor excision circle based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in Southeast and East Asia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Newborn screening for SCID: the very first prospective pilot study from Türkiye.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After it was demonstrated in 2005 that T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) quantification for dried blood spot (DBS) samples on Guthrie cards is an effective means of SCID screening and following several pilot studies, the practice was formally recommended in the US in 2010. More and more countries have adopted it since then. In France, before the health authorities could recommend adding SCID to the list of five diseases that were routinely screened for, feasibility and cost-effectiveness studies had to be conducted with a sufficiently large cohort of neonates. We carried out three such studies: The first sought to verify the effectiveness of the assay. The second, DEPISTREC, evaluated the feasibility of universal SCID screening in France and assessed the clinical benefit and economic advantage it would provide. Through the third study, NeoSKID, still under way and to continue until recommendations are issued, we have been offering SCID screening in the Pays de la Loire region of France. This review briefly describes routine newborn screening (NBS) and management of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) in France, and then considers the lessons from our studies and the status of SCID screening implementation within the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.