Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34287013›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2021

Associations between Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Drilling and Term Birth Weight and Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants in Texas: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Mary D Willis, Elaine L Hill, Andrew Boslett, Molly L Kile, Susan E Carozza, Perry Hystad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of oil and gas boom and busts on working-age mortality in the U.S.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The human health effects of unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD): A scoping review of epidemiologic studies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary D WillisSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Elaine L HillDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Andrew BoslettDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Molly L KileSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Susan E CarozzaSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Perry HystadSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute TL1 ProgramTL1TR002371 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLISON Deborah FRYER, JESSINA C MCGREGOR · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
The Health Consequences of Shale Gas DevelopmentDP5OD021338 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HILL, ELAINE L · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Environmental Data Integration to Assess Impacts of Shale Gas Development on Perinatal Health Outcomes and Childhood CancersF31ES029801 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIS, MARY D · 2019 to 2020
$55k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002371NIEHS NIH HHS F31 ES029801NIH HHS DP5 OD021338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOil and natural gas extraction may produce environmental pollution at levels that affect reproductive health of nearby populations. Available studies have primarily focused on unconventional gas drilling and have not accounted for local population changes that can coincide with drilling activity.

objectiveOur study sought to examine associations between residential proximity to oil and gas drilling and adverse term birth outcomes using a difference-in-differences study design.

methodsWe created a retrospective population-based term birth cohort in Texas between 1996 and 2009 composed of mother-infant dyads (

resultsThe adjusted mean difference in term birth weight for mothers living 0-1 vs.

conclusionsResiding near oil and gas drilling sites during pregnancy was associated with a small reduction in term birth weight but not SGA, with some evidence of environmental injustices. Additional work is needed to investigate specific drilling-related exposures that might explain these associations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7678.

Indexed as

Birth WeightInfant, Small for Gestational AgeOil and Gas FieldsPregnancy OutcomeEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTexas

Identifiers

PMID34287013
PMCPMC8293911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.