Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286893›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2022

Potency of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 variants of concern: A systematic review of in vitro studies.

Maryam Noori, Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi, Shahnam Arshi, Kristin Carson-Chahhoud, Khalil Ansarin, Ali-Asghar Kolahi, Saeid Safiri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Multifaceted roles of Fcγ receptors in COVID-19 and vaccine responses.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. [Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam NooriStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Aria NejadghaderiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-9720
Shahnam ArshiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kristin Carson-ChahhoudAustralian Centre for Precision Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.
Khalil AnsarinRahat Breath and Sleep Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-5224
Ali-Asghar KolahiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-3732
Saeid SafiriTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-9072
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IRUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

National Institute for Medical Research DevelopmentShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTabriz University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are two types of mRNA-based vaccine platforms that have received emergency use authorization. The emergence of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) variants has raised concerns of reduced sensitivity to neutralization by their elicited antibodies. We aimed to systematically review the most recent in vitro studies evaluating the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 induced neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in addition to bioRxiv and medRxiv with terms including 'SARS-CoV-2', 'BNT162b2', 'mRNA-1273', and 'neutralizing antibody' up to June 29, 2021. A modified version of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist was used for assessing included study quality. A total 36 in vitro studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in this systematic review. B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), and B.1.617.2 (Delta) are four SARS-CoV-2 variants that have recently been identified as variants of concern. Included studies implemented different methods regarding pseudovirus or live virus neutralization assays for measuring neutralization titres against utilized viruses. After two dose vaccination by BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, the B.1.351 variant had the least sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies, while B.1.1.7 variant had the most sensitivity; that is, it was better neutralized relative to the comparator strain. P.1 and B.1.617.2 variants had an intermediate level of impaired naturalization activity of antibodies elicited by prior vaccination. Our review suggests that immune sera derived from vaccinated individuals might show reduced protection of individuals immunized with mRNA vaccines against more recent SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumans2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesBNT162b2mRNA-1273neutralizing antibodySARS-CoV-2variants of concern

Identifiers

PMID34286893
PMCPMC8420542
OpenAlexW3185220681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.