Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286822›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2022

Multiplanar Stiffness of Commercial Carbon Composite Ankle-Foot Orthoses.

Benjamin R Shuman, Elizabeth Russell Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin R ShumanDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, San Antonio, TX 78234; Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, VA Puget Sound, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108.
Elizabeth Russell EspositoDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, San Antonio, TX 78234; Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, VA Puget Sound, 660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Funding

Modeling, Design, and Testing of a Joint Replacement for MTPJ1R21AR069283 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TELFER, SCOTT · 2016 to 2017
$374k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR069283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical properties of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) can impact how a user's movement is either restricted or augmented by the device. However, standardized methods for assessing stiffness properties of AFOs are lacking, posing a challenge for comparing between devices and across vendors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the rotational stiffness of thirteen commercial, nonarticulated, carbon composite ankle-foot orthoses. A custom, instrumented test fixture, for evaluating mechanical properties in rotating exoskeletons (EMPIRE), deflected an AFO through 20 deg of plantar/dorsiflexion motion about a specified, but adjustable, ankle axis. Sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane rotational stiffness were calculated, and reliability was assessed between cycles, sessions, and testers. The EMPIRE demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability between testers, sessions, and cycles (intraclass correlation coefficients all ≥0.95 for sagittal plane stiffness measures). Sagittal plane AFO stiffness ranged from 0.58 N·m/deg to 3.66 N·m/deg. AFOs with a lateral strut demonstrated frontal plane stiffnesses up to 0.71 N·m/deg of eversion while those with a medial strut demonstrated frontal plane stiffnesses up to 0.53 N·m/deg of inversion. Transverse plane stiffnesses were less than 0.30 N·m/deg of internal or external rotation. These results directly compare AFOs of different models and from different manufacturers using consistent methodology and are intended as a resource for clinicians in identifying a device with stiffness properties for individual patients.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesAnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaCarbonGaitHumansReproducibility of ResultsCarbonankle axisankle-foot orthosisreliability testingrotational stiffness

Identifiers

PMID34286822
PMCPMC8420787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.