Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286685›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2021

Peridomestic Mammal Susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection.

Angela M Bosco-Lauth, J Jeffrey Root, Stephanie M Porter, Audrey E Walker, Lauren Guilbert, Daphne Hawvermale, Aimee Pepper, Rachel M Maison, Airn E Hartwig, Paul Gordy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela M Bosco-Lauth
J Jeffrey Root
Stephanie M Porter
Audrey E Walker
Lauren Guilbert
Daphne Hawvermale
Aimee Pepper
Rachel M Maison
Airn E Hartwig
Paul Gordy
Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann
Richard A Bowen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild animals have been implicated as the origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but it is largely unknown how the virus affects most wildlife species and if wildlife could ultimately serve as a reservoir for maintaining the virus outside the human population. We show that several common peridomestic species, including deer mice, bushy-tailed woodrats, and striped skunks, are susceptible to infection and can shed the virus in respiratory secretions. In contrast, we demonstrate that cottontail rabbits, fox squirrels, Wyoming ground squirrels, black-tailed prairie dogs, house mice, and racoons are not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results expand the knowledge base of susceptible species and provide evidence that human-wildlife interactions could result in continued transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsAnimals, WildDisease SusceptibilityHumansMammalsMicecoronaviruscoronavirus diseasecottontail rabbitCOVID-19deer mouseexperimental infectionhouse mouseinfectionsmesocarnivoreperidomesticraccoonrespiratory infectionsrodentSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2squirrelstriped skunkUnited Statesviruseswildlifewoodratzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34286685
PMCPMC8314817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.