Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286452›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy using non-ECG-gated

Jens Sörensen, Jonny Nordström, Tomasz Baron, Stellan Mörner, Sven-Olof Granstam, Mark Lubberink, Lars Tolbod, Jeffrey van den Berg, Frank A Flachskampf, Tanja Kero and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy assessed withEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Sörensen *Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. jens.sorensen@pet.uu.se.
Jonny Nordström *Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomasz BaronDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stellan MörnerDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sven-Olof GranstamDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mark LubberinkDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lars TolbodNuclear Medicine and PET, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jeffrey van den BergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Frank A FlachskampfDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tanja KeroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter MagnussonCentre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg/Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden.
Hendrik J HarmsDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEAarhus University · DKKarolinska Institutet · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a method for diagnosing left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy from cardiac perfusion

methodsWe retrospectively pooled data from 139 subjects in four research cohorts. LV remodeling patterns ranged from normal to severe eccentric and concentric hypertrophy.

resultsHigh correlations were found in the blinded analyses (r ≥ 0.87, P < 0.0001 for all). AUC for detecting increased LVM and WT (> 12 mm and > 15 mm) was ≥ 0.95 (P < 0.0001 for all). Reproducibility was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.93, P < 0.0001).

conclusion

Indexed as

Hypertrophy, Left VentricularWaterHumansPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesWater15O-waterCardiac remodelingLeft ventricular hypertrophyPositron emission tomographyWall thickness

Identifiers

PMID34286452
PMCPMC9553817
OpenAlexW3185098628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.