ReviewHeart failure reviews2022
Deciphering hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with electrocardiography.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Hypertrophic or Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Development and Validation of a Fine-Tuned ResNet50 Model Based on Electrocardiogram Image.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The comprehensive assessment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a complex process, with each step concurrently focusing on confirmation of the diagnosis, differentiation between sarcomeric and non-sarcomeric disease (phenocopy), and prognostication. Novel modalities such as genetic testing and advanced imaging have allowed for substantial advancements in the understanding of this condition and facilitate patient management. However, their availability is at present not universal, and interpretation requires a high level of expertise. In this setting, electrocardiography, a fast and widely available method, still retains a significant role in everyday clinical assessment of this population. In our review, we follow a stepwise approach for the interpretation of each electrocardiographic segment, discussing clinical implications of electrocardiographic patterns in sarcomeric disease, their value in the differential diagnosis from phenocopies, and impact on patient management. Outlining the substantial amount of information to be obtained from a simple tracing, we exhibit how electrocardiography is likely to remain an integral diagnostic tool in the future as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.