ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2022
Microencapsulated and Lyophilized Lactobacillus acidophilus Improved Gut Health and Immune Status of Preruminant Calves.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Probiotic Compounds as Feed Additives on Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Metabolic Blood Indices During the Preweaning Period of Holstein Dairy Calves.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Evaluation of probiotic supplementation to enhance growth, immune response, intestinal function, and survival in extensively raised neonatal alpacas in the Peruvian Central-southern Andes.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Impact of lactic acid bacteria andVeterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Effects of inactivatedAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Article
- In Vitro Characterization and Safety Assessment ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Probiotic Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Donkey Feces in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Non-encapsulated, encapsulated, and lyophilized probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri SW23 influenced the growth and gut health in calves.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Autochthonous buffalo-gut originAnimal biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tibetan chickens on the growth performance and gut microbiota of broiler.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Host-specific probiotics feeding influence growth, gut microbiota, and fecal biomarkers in buffalo calves.AMB Express · 2022Article
- Effects of Milk Replacer-BasedMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to study the effect of microencapsulated, lyophilized, or fermented milk using Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC15 as a probiotic to improve gut health, growth, nutrient utilization, and immunity status of young crossbred calves. The viable culture of L. acidophilus was used for preparation of different probiotic forms/products. To compare the efficacy of probiotic products, twenty crossbred calves (3-day old) were divided into four groups (n = 5), control (C), fed only milk and basal diet, and treatment groups, supplemented with microencapsulated, fermented, and lyophilized probiotic at 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.