Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286385›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2021

Considerations on the Demography of BIA-ALCL in European Countries Based on an E(A)SAPS Survey.

Birgit Stark, Martin Magnéli, Ivar van Heijningen, Carlos Parreira, Urs Bösch, Michel Rouif, Martin Halle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Update on T-Cell Lymphoma Epidemiology.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Birgit StarkDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Birgit.Stark@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7112-0718
Martin MagnéliInstitution for Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ivar van HeijningenPlastic Surgery Department, AZ Zeno and Duinbergen Clinic, Knokke-Heist, Belgium.
Carlos ParreiraHospital Garcia de Orta, Avenue Torrado da Silva, 2805-267, Almada, Portugal.
Urs BöschPlastic Surgery, MEON Clinic, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Michel Rouif, 30, Bld Heurteloup, 37000, Tours, Loire Valley, France.
Martin HalleDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of evidence indicates that breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is associated with the use of certain breast implants. Regional variations have been reported, and a genetic susceptibility has also been suggested. However, large variations in the ability to correctly diagnose BIA-ALCL and to further report and register cases exist between countries and may in part explain variations in the demography. MATERIAL AND

methodsA survey was conducted by The European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery E(A)SAPS and sent to 48 European countries. The primary aim was to identify the total number of confirmed cases of and deaths from BIA-ALCL in each country during four consecutive measurements over a two-year period.

resultsAn increase in BIA-ALCL cases during four repeated measurements from a total of 305 in April 2019 to 434 in November 2020 was reported by 23 of the 33 responding countries. A nearly 100-fold variation in the number of cases per million inhabitants was noted, where Netherlands had the highest rate (4.12) followed by Finland (1.99). Countries with the lowest reported rates were Austria (0.078), Romania (0.052) and Turkey (0.048).

conclusionThe current study displays a notable variation ßin the number of confirmed BIA-ALCL cases across Europe, even for countries with established breast implant registers. Variations in diagnosis and reporting systems may explain the differences, but the influence of genetic variations and the prevalence of high-risk implants cannot be excluded. Incomplete sales data along with medical tourism preclude an absolute risk assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticEstheticsFemaleHumansPrevalenceBIA-ALCLBreast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphomaEASAPSEuropean survey

Identifiers

PMID34286385
PMCPMC8677632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.