ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021
Percutaneous Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations of the Hand: A Multicenter Analysis.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection rate and mutational landscape in extracranial arteriovenous malformations: a cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Combined treatment with Nd:YAG laser and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in venous malformation of the hand: case report.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2026Article
- Prospective analysis of bleomycin electrosclerotherapy for clinical outcome and volume reduction in therapy refractory slow-flow malformations.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of venous malformation and fibro-adipose vascular anomaly: prognostic factors of clinical efficacy.European radiology · 2025Article
- A Review of Soft Tissue and Nerve Masses in the Pediatric Hand: Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management Strategies.Cureus · 2025Review
- In-human clinical experience with direct stick embolization of low-flow vascular malformations using a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2025Article
- Outcome of bleomycin electrosclerotherapy of slow-flow malformations in adults and children.European radiology · 2024Article
- Extracranial Vascular Anomalies Driven by RAS/MAPK Variants: Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes and predictors of bleomycin polidocanol foam sclerotherapy treatment response in venous malformations.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Results of interventional treatment of peripheral slow-flow malformations.CVIR endovascular · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life of Multimodal Treatment of Extracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: The APOLLON Study Protocol.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Prior to Percutaneous Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations-Proof of Concept Study for Prediction of Clinical Outcome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Palmar Venous Malformation: A Case Report of a Rare Occurrence and a Treatment Algorithm.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Multicentered analysis of percutaneous sclerotherapies in venous malformations of the face.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the safety and outcome of percutaneous sclerotherapy for treating venous malformations (VMs) of the hand. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective multicenter trial of 29 patients with VMs primarily affecting the hand, including wrist, carpus, and/or fingers, treated by 81 percutaneous image-guided sclerotherapies using ethanol gel and/or polidocanol was performed. Clinical and imaging findings were assessed to evaluate clinical response, lesion size reduction, and complication rates. Substratification analysis was performed with respect to the Puig's classification, the sclerosing agent, the injected volume of the sclerosant, and to previously performed treatments.
resultsThe mean number of procedures per patient was 2.8 (± 2.2). Last follow-up (mean = 9.2 months) revealed a partial relief of symptoms in 78.9% (15/19), while three patients (15.8%) presented symptom-free and one patient (5.3%) with no improvement. Post-treatment imaging revealed an overall objective response rate of 88.9%. Early post-procedural complications occurred after 5/81 sclerotherapies (6.2%) and were entirely resolved by conservative means. Type of VM (Puig's classification) as well as sclerosing agent had no impact on clinical response (p = 0.85, p = 0.11) or complication rates (p = 0.66, p = 0.69). The complication rates were not associated with the sclerosant volume injected (p = 0.76). In addition, no significant differences in clinical success (p = 0.11) or complication rates (p = 0.89) were detected when comparing patients with history of previous treatments compared to therapy-naive patients.
conclusionPercutaneous sclerotherapy is both safe and effective for treating VMs of the hand. Even patients with history of previous treatments benefit from further sclerotherapy showing similar low complication rates to therapy-naive patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.