ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021
Candidate reference measurement procedure based on HPAEC-PAD for the development of certified reference materials for monosaccharides in serum.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantification of Monosaccharides in Blood and Urine by HPAEC-PAD.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Development of Certified Reference Material for Amino Acids in Dried Blood Spots and Accuracy Assessment of Disc Sampling.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To achieve the measurement reliability of monosaccharides used as diagnostic markers in clinical fields, it is essential to establish certified reference materials (CRMs). The purpose of this study is to develop a serum CRM by adopting high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) as a new candidate reference measurement procedure for the measurement of glucose and galactose, common diagnostic markers of diabetes and galactosemia, respectively. Using various monosaccharides as internal standards, the accuracy of the HPAEC-PAD method was tested by measuring glucose CRM following treatment with three different deproteinization methods: ultrafiltration, protein precipitation by trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and protein precipitation by acetonitrile. Results showed that ultrafiltration and 5% TCA provided good accuracy with every tested monosaccharide as the internal standard. Accordingly, serum samples in this study were treated by ultrafiltration after adding 2-deoxy-D-glucose and arabinose, which were selected as internal standards for galactose and glucose, respectively. Both intra- and inter-day recovery tests showed good precision and accuracy within 2%. From the serum CRM batches prepared at two levels, 11 units were analyzed by exact-matched calibration methods, and the mass fractions of galactose and glucose were determined via HPAEC-PAD. The between-unit relative standard deviations were not more than 1.5%, showing homogeneity. The expanded uncertainties (%) of galactose and glucose for both levels were less than 3.6% and 2.3% at 95% confidence. The HPAEC-PAD method presented in this study can significantly improve the accuracy and precision of simultaneous monosaccharide analysis, allowing for the development of further serum CRMs for monosaccharides. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.