ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2021
Role of surveillance screening in detecting tumor recurrence after treatment of childhood cancers.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking surveillance imaging to reduce radiation exposure among survivors of childhood cancer.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Changes in perioperative serum transaminase levels: predicting early recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs the survival rates in children with cancer reach up to 80%, this improvement in survival increases the number of patients under follow-up. After cancer treatment is completed, patients are taken to follow-up surveillance to ensure the early detection of recurrence and the late effects of treatments. The frequency and necessity of surveillance screening tests are controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of surveillance screening in the detection of recurrence. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe files of 533 children who were diagnosed as having cancer at our pediatric oncology clinic between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. We looked at outcomes after recurrence, the timing and pattern of recurrence, the presence of symptoms during recurrence, physical examination findings, tumor marker levels, laboratory findings, and radiologic tests.
resultsOf the 63 patients with recurrence, 23 were symptomatic and 40 were asymptomatic at the time of the recurrence. Tumor location and time of the recurrence did not affect the post recurrence survival. The median post-recurrence survival for patients was 13 (range, 1-98) months. The median post-relapse survival was 10 (range, 1-73) months in patients with symptomatic recurrence, and 16 (range, 1-98) months in patients with asymptomatic recurrence. It was determined that patients in whom recurrence was identified with surveillance tests had longer post-relapse survival time. The 5-year survival rate of 23 patients with symptomatic recurrence was 12.2%; this rate was 49.5% in asymptomatic patients (p<0.05).
conclusionsIt should be considered that surveillance testing offers the benefit of prolonging post recurrence survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.