ReviewAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2019
Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A review of drugs available for advanced therapy.
Review in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- BMPR2 Loss Activates AKT by Disrupting DLL4/NOTCH1 and PPARγ Signaling in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has traditionally been considered a rare disease with a uniformly poor prognosis. However, this was prior to the introduction of advanced therapies for this condition, and more recent registries in the treatment era have shown 5-year survival rates of up to 65%. Prior to 2000, there was only one licensed therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); less than 20 years later, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 14 different medications for PAH. This review aims to summarise for the general pulmonologist the evidence for the current internationally available advanced therapies for PAH (World Health Organization Group I disease), which is characterised haemodynamically by the presence of precapillary PH in the absence of another cause. The benefit of these agents, either alone or in combinations, is now undisputed and their use is advocated in all current international guidelines for PAH. The improvement in survival of patients with PAH over the concurrent timeline emphasises the importance both of the availability and usage of effective therapies and of patients being seen in specialist centres, where physicians are familiar with using these therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.