ArticleFuture healthcare journal2021
Adaptation of a respiratory service to provide CPAP for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, outside of a critical care setting, in a district general hospital.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'Do-not-intubate' orders in patients assisted by noninvasive respiratory support for acute hypoxaemic failure caused by coronavirus disease 2019; a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOne-hundred and forty patients at Croydon University Hospital received continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on a specialist respiratory ward, as a bridge to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or as a ceiling of care for COVID-19. This retrospective study aimed to outline service expansion, patient characteristics and explore risk factors in outcomes.
resultsMean age of patients on CPAP was 64 years (standard deviation 12). The median number of days from admission to CPAP initiation was 1 day (interquartile range (IQR) 0-3), and time before successful wean off CPAP was 4 days (IQR 2-6). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 64%. Thirty-four per cent of patients went onto require IMV, 24% improved off CPAP and 41% were palliated. The 28-day non-survivor group were of older age, had statistically significant higher admission creatinine and higher peak oxygen requirement. Age above 65 years was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio 5.9; 95% confidence interval 2.63-13.3).
conclusionCPAP is a viable ceiling-of-treatment option in those unsuitable for ventilation, and may even avoid the need for ventilation in others. Duration on CPAP may be useful for service provision to predict resource allocation. The rapidity from admission to CPAP initiation highlights the need for early ceilings of care to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.