Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286193›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2021

Innovate to secure the future: the future of modern medicine.

Sally C Davies, Claire Oxlade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Antimicrobial resistance, infection prevention and control, and conflict in the Middle East.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sally C DaviesDepartment of Health and Social Care London, UK.
Claire OxladeDepartment of Health and Social Care, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As drug-resistant pathogens emerge and spread globally, antimicrobial (especially antibiotic) treatments are becoming less effective. As infections become more complex and costly to treat in humans and animals, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge of real and increasing scale and complexity. If we do not act for the long term and with sustainability in mind, the annual deaths we see currently, numbering 700,000 globally, will rise each year to 10 million by 2050. To effectively contain and mitigate AMR, we need more evidence of the drivers and impacts of AMR on human, animal and environmental health, and the links between them. We also need to turn evidence into action and tailored, sustainable approaches for countries and communities, which put clinicians and patients at the centre. Excellent research is underway across the world into innovation (including new treatments, diagnostics and vaccines), infection prevention and behavioural interventions. In this article, we explore how, where and why research should be intensified, with increased collaboration and transparency, to strengthen global health security and secure the future of modern medicine for patients globally.

Indexed as

AMRantimicrobial resistance

Identifiers

PMID34286193
PMCPMC8285149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.