Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34286190›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2021

The future of acute and emergency care.

Virginia Newcombe, Timothy Coats, Paul Dark, Anthony Gordon, Steve Harris, Danny F McAuley, David K Menon, Susanna Price, Zudin Puthucheary, Mervyn Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Virginia NewcombeUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge UK.
Timothy CoatsUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Paul DarkManchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK and Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Manchester, UK.
Anthony GordonImperial College London, London, UK.
Steve HarrisUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Danny F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, UK and Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
David K MenonUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge UK.
Susanna PriceRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK and National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Zudin PuthuchearyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, London, UK and Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Mervyn SingerUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK and Bloomsbury Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved outcomes for acutely unwell patients are predicated on early identification of deterioration, accelerating the time to accurate diagnosis of the underlying condition, selection and titration of treatments that target biological phenotypes, and personalised endpoints to achieve optimal benefit yet minimise iatrogenic harm. Technological developments entering routine clinical practice over the next decade will deliver a sea change in patient management. Enhanced point of care diagnostics, more sophisticated physiological and biochemical monitoring with superior analytics and computer-aided support tools will all add considerable artificial intelligence to complement clinical skills. Experts in different fields of emergency and critical care medicine offer their perspectives as to which research developments could make a big difference within the next decade.

Indexed as

acute careemergency careprecision medicinestratified medicine

Identifiers

PMID34286190
PMCPMC8285133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.